Veteran Member
Posts: 1740
Liked By: 75
Joined: 24 Oct 02
Tipsters Championship:
Player
has not started
|
honestly, if you are suggesting to make serious money from roulette, going by your method gives you an advantage in winning? lets look at it in the probability way. 0 (green) aside if by buying black or red, each gives you a 50% chance of winning right? your method sounds good at the start ----> let say you have enough capital to double up 5-8 times. meaning that at the start the probablility of you losing 5 times in a row is 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.03125 which means a mere 3.1%, convert it to 8, it will be 0.0039 which means a negligible 0.04%. Sounds great isint it? all the odds are in your favour??? not quite. This only works if the event are dependent on each other. However, in roulette, after every round, there is a new spin and a new toss of ball. which makes it a totally independent event. meaning that the previous outcome has nothing to do with the next outcome. Hence, thinking about double up? your chance of losing is still 50% for the 2nd round the upcoming rounds that you will place your bets. In the double up method, when you win, you win abit... but when you lose, you lose alot. There are plenty of people who lost big time using the martingale system in roulette. What sets you aside from them? or is it that your time is not there yet? gambling in casino is a sure lose for gamblers (as in all the gamblers combine) and a win for the operators because the odds are stacked against us. Instead of thinking how to win in the casino, think how to lose in the casino. People lost heavily using the martingale system, can you win heavily using it? not many people have the mentality to lose at the casino, thats why i think they end up losing. Winning heavily using the martingale system is possible, but how you use it matters. is it double up when losing, or double up when winning? one lets you win abit but lose alot. the other lets you lose abit but win alot. your choice.
J.J
|